Music = changing perspectives
March 25, 2011
Tchaikovsky changed my life today over a span of about twenty minutes.
Anyone who knows me well knows that Shakespeare and music are two of my great loves. Anyone who knows me better knows that two of the things I complain about most are music theory homework and Romeo and Juliet.
My complaints about the former are typical of many of my peers: “I’m a performance major. I don’t need to be able to analyze instrumental scores; I’m a vocalist.” I have always had a great amount of respect and admiration for the music we’ve studied in the past, but I always argued petulantly while doing my homework that “picking these pieces apart and talking about them in such technical terms just takes out all of the artistry and expression. It kills the mood.
My issue with the latter is much more unique. I have been obsessed with Shakespeare ever since I could read. My parents had the complete works on a bookshelf in our basement, and I used to go down and read them aloud (albeit very badly, I’m sure) just because I loved the way the words sounded. As I got older, I started to really understand what they were all about, and began delving into all of the plays and dissecting every word to be sure I was getting the fullest meaning out of the text. It became one of my hobbies, and led me later to pursue an outside field (and eventual second major) in theatre. Shakespeare had no flaws in my eyes…except for one massive, important work: Romeo and Juliet.
I have never hated the play; I can see as well as anyone that it’s really well-composed and well-written. However, the more I studied this play (once in high school, twice in college), the more I felt completely disillusioned and annoyed by the characters of Romeo and Juliet themselves. As a child, I assumed that there was nothing more romantic than Romeo and Juliet because it was Romeo and Juliet. The issue I began to take with the play was that their relationship was completely ridiculous; I was that girl in high school who wouldn’t date because she thought high school students were stupid and immature and didn’t really understand what love is. Granted, I still think that. That’s why I started getting so annoyed with Romeo and Juliet. They were just two stupid kids who thought they had fallen in love at first sight, when in actuality they were just giving into to their raging hormones.
The last time I read this play, I had their relationship explained to me in a different way that made me hate them somewhat less. It was the idea that their relationship is supposed to be kind of ridiculous because it’s supposed to represent something transcendental and fated, not held back by conventions. “That’s great,” I said to myself, “but it still sounds like a lot of flimsy theatrical justification for a hurried romance.” I understood that Romeo and Juliet were supposed to act as a catalyst to end the family feuding, but I couldn’t get past the way their relationship itself seemed so unrealistic.
Today in class, we talked about Tchaikovsky’s Romeo and Juliet Fantasy Overture, and all of a sudden, my whole perspective on all of this changed. Tchaikovsky, it seems, understood the theme of this show better than any scholar I’ve ever read, and he expressed it better through his musical technique than any author has ever done with words.
Everyone knows the love theme from this piece, but I had never heard it in the context of the overture. This gorgeous, rich theme springs unexpectedly out of the midst of turbulent, violent music that perfectly captures the bloody brutality of the family feud. I finally understood: That’s the whole point!
Romeo and Juliet’s relationship isn’t about relationships at all, and it’s not really even about the family feud. Today I finally understood that the “transcendence” of their relationship is not the fact that they fell in love against all odds; the transcendence is that out of the darkness of violence, brutality, bloodshed, and hatred, a sudden light of heartbreaking beauty and innocence is born when it seemed that there was no hope for such to exist. Romeo and Juliet aren’t characters – they are an ideal of hope in the middle of terror. They are the sacrificial unblemished lamb led to the slaughter so that peace and justice can reign once again. The sacrifice of their pure, star-crossed, youthful love is what it took for forgiveness to be had. The tragedy is merely that something so hopeful had to die before the dream of a better world could be realized.
The point of all of this is that I learned two very important lessons today in a music theory class. The first is what I’ve already stated; that is, I finally understood the real meaning and theme of Romeo and Juliet. The second, though, is that music theory doesn’t detract from the art of music – music theory is the art of music. If it hadn’t been for our brief discussion of Tchaikovsky’s sudden chromatic modulation to introduce the love theme after extensive measures of violent, harsh music, I never would have understood the full theme of the play itself, and the masterful expression of the musical love theme would have fallen on deaf ears. I would have hummed along and thought, “Hm, this is a nice piece” without ever actually understanding why the piece is so brilliant.
I am finally convinced that music theory is not only relevant and important to my development as a musician, but that it is absolutely vital. In fact, it has proven to be relevant not only to the way that I approach music, but to my perspective on other things as well. So while this isn’t necessarily life-altering or earth-shattering, I feel very strongly about my change in perspective and just needed to share.



















































